Panevo Case Study: Boiler Room Energy Conservation Measures
Find out More
Case Study · Energy Optimization

Boiler Room Energy Conservation Measures

Food and Beverage Processing Facility  ·  Nova Scotia  ·  Energy Savings Audit

Project Type
6-Measure ECM Bundle & M&V
Pre-Project Minimum Savings Estimate
~$94K/yr
Actual Verified Savings
~$202K/yr
Best ECM Payback
~4 Months
The Challenge

Without dedicated sub-metering, energy conservation opportunities may be difficult to identify. Panevo's walkthrough audit of this dairy processing facility identified six Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) spanning power quality, lighting, and boiler systems without available metering data. Findings included a failed capacitor bank (invisible to the site due to how the electricity provider charges for power), inefficient steam boiler sample cooling and missing controls, high boiler stack heat loss, and inefficient hot water generation design. Savings were initially estimated at over $94K using first principles, utility bill analysis, and manual measurements.

Boiler room facility
Panevo's Approach
1
Audit
Baseline assessment & 6 x ECM identification
2
Bundle
ECM scoping, equipment sizing & quoting
3
Implement
Successive measure deployment across systems
4
Verify
Production & temperature regression M&V modeling
Proven Results
$202K
Actual annual cost savings, 2× the pre-project estimate
498 tCO₂e
Greenhouse gas reduction per year (model-adjusted)
9,960 GJ
Annual natural gas savings
97.7%
Power factor achieved, up from 77.8% baseline
Verified Performance: Before & After
Power factor and billed demand before/after capacitor bank replacement
Power factor & billed demand, before/after capacitor bank replacement
Monthly natural gas consumption, actual vs. regression model, 12 months pre vs. post-implementation
Actual vs. modeled natural gas consumption through implementation
Hurdles Overcome

No dedicated metering infrastructure: Without sub-meters in place, savings were quantified through engineering fundamentals and manual field measurements, such as bucket-and-timer water flow readings to validate boiler water ECMs. Panevo claimed savings for only what could be independently proven due to multiple parallel site projects impacting water consumption.

Dynamic baseline modeling: Natural gas savings required Panevo to prepare a custom production & temperature regression model, which revealed the site increased production by ~14% while operating in an ~8% colder year. Raw consumption data alone would have understated performance. The model confirmed the site consumed ~22% less natural gas than expected, unlocking ~$173K in annual avoided gas costs.

The Panevo Difference

A single walkthrough audit identified six measures estimated to save ~$94K per year. After Panevo designed, implemented, and verified the program, actual savings were more than double the original estimate, at ~$202K annually.

Panevo achieved this without relying on dedicated sub-metering. Where instruments were not available, Panevo's engineers used field measurement techniques and production-adjusted regression models to quantify performance.

Savings were claimed only where they could be independently verified, in accordance with IPMVP principles for Measurement & Verification.