Panevo Case Study: Air Compressor Controls Optimization
Find out More
Case Study · Energy Optimization

Air Compressor Controls Optimization

Manufacturing Facility  ·  Nova Scotia  ·  24/7 Operations

Project Type
Compressed Air Audit, Sizing, and Sequencing
Baseline Energy Use
~1,710 MWh/yr
Project Duration
6 Weeks
Implementation Cost
$0 (No New Equipment)
The Challenge

This Nova Scotia manufacturing facility runs 24/7 production supplied by a single 350 HP modulating rotary screw air compressor, with two smaller trim units on standby. A Panevo audit using metered compressed air data from the site's ioTORQ EMIS platform showed that the modulating unit was oversized and performed poorly most of the time, consuming more electricity than necessary. Panevo identified an opportunity to cut power consumption by shifting duty to the backup compressors during those periods, but the site needed to trial the change under live conditions before adopting it permanently. That same meter data justifies a further capital project to replace one or both compressors, projected to deliver a further 10% in energy savings on top of the results below.

Outdoor packaged 350 HP modulating rotary screw air compressor enclosure
Panevo's Approach
1
Meter & Audit
Baseline data via existing ioTORQ EMIS platform, on-site assessment of unit operation
2
Diagnose
Identified poor part-load performance of the modulating unit versus metered CFM demand
3
Trial
Site trialed shifting lead duty to the smaller backup compressors during low-load periods
4
Verify
Confirmed sustained power reduction & uninterrupted air supply via ioTORQ trends
Proven Results
28%
Lower power draw supplying the backup compressors vs. the modulating unit
~$72K
Annual electricity savings
~483MWh
Estimated annual energy savings, approximately 8% of total site power
+10%
Further site power savings identified for a potential future compressor replacement project
System Performance
28%
Power Draw
Verified via ioTORQ metered trend data, same air demand met
ioTORQ power trend: modulating compressor vs. backup compressors

The blue line shows baseline input energy to the modulating compressor. Mid-chart, the unit is switched off and the backup compressors take over, shown as the red line, at roughly 28% lower power for equivalent production rates, while compressed air demand continues to be fully met.

Daily compressed air cost savings and CuSum trend versus the 350 HP compressor baseline model

Cost Savings Tracking: Live metering data feeds a dashboard summarizing real-time compressed air cost savings, summed daily here. The below chart shows ongoing performance, with current operation (blue) outperforming the prior baseline (red) during all observed hours.

The Solution

Metered diagnosis, not guesswork: Panevo used existing ioTORQ EMIS power and flow trends to show the main modulating compressor performed well at high loads but poorly at low loads, rather than relying on nameplate assumptions.

No-capex right-sizing: Recommended running the existing smaller backup compressors as the lead units during low-load periods instead of the main modulating compressor, requiring no new equipment purchase.

Site-validated trial: The site trialed the change under live production conditions, confirming the backup compressors could fully meet demand with markedly better results than expected before the change was adopted permanently.

Ongoing verification: Continued monitoring through the ioTORQ dashboard confirms the power reduction is sustained and air delivery remains uninterrupted.

Next-phase capital project: Using the metered data from this project, Panevo identified a further capital project, replacing the compressors, projected to add approximately 48,300 kWh/yr (~$7.2K) in additional annual savings on top of the results above.

Hurdles Overcome

24/7 live production: The compressor switch-over was executed without stopping the production line, using live ioTORQ data to time and validate the transition in real time.

Risk of undersupply: Backup compressors are typically sized for redundancy, not primary duty. Panevo validated with metered data that supply would remain adequate before recommending the permanent operational change.

Shifting demand baseline: The site had recently installed new equipment that significantly changed its compressed air demand. Panevo timed implementation to match the site's true, current demand rather than the demand levels recorded when the assessment began.

Unique configuration constraints: The existing modulating compressor was controlled by a legacy combination of remote variable speed drive and modulation - initial review seemed to show that the compressor had a VFD, however a deeper analysis revealed the true operation of this component and the potential savings opportunity.